Boardside Chat Hints at Forthcoming Relief for Appellant-Applicants

Author: Justin N. Mullen
Editor: Amanda K. Murphy, Ph.D.

On February 2, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) hosted one of a series of Boardside Chats by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) to discuss, among other topics, ex parte appeal pendency. While the current PTAB statistics dashboard (reproduced below) indicates that the majority of current ex parte appeals remain pending for more than 14 months, the Board has reduced its ex parte appeal inventory by over 4% in the past three months.

Appeal Inventory

Specifically, the Board has reduced its backlog of pending ex parte appeals by 1,665 appeals from September 8, 2015 to January 19, 2016, as shown in the bar graph below. While the total reduction may appear to merely be an incremental improvement, the rate of reduction shows significant improvement over fiscal year 2014, during which the number of pending ex parte appeals actually increased by 69 appeals.

Pending Ex Parte Appeals Inventory

The Boardside Chat also provided pendency statistics for appeals from each Technology Center (TC). As shown in the chart below, appeal pendency varies among Technology Centers. For example, ex parte appeals in applications handled by TC 2400, which handles inventions directed to cable television, computer networks, multiplex communications, voice‑over‑IP, compression, cryptography, and security, currently face the longest wait for a Board decision. In contrast, appeals from T Cs 1600 and 1700, which focus on inventions in the biotechnology and chemistry fields, are processed by the Board about 30% faster, with 27.7 and 24.5 months to a Board Decision on average, respectively.

Pendancy of Ex Parte Appeals

As ex parte appeal pendency changes over time and varies among technology areas, Applicants may wish to consult the current appeal pendency statistics for the Technology Center assigned to their application when contemplating whether to reopen prosecution before the Examiner or appeal to the Board. Such statistics may assist Applicants in making patent portfolio decisions based on current business needs.

As with other Boardside Chats, the USPTO has provided the presentation materials to the public, selections from which were incorporated into this post.

DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.

Tagged , , , , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: